Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CONYERS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv01316
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT CONYERS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, REMENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULMER et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv01108
Plaintiff:
IRENE M. FULMER and ELLIOT A. FULMER
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCCISANO et al v. TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN et al
as 3:2011cv06558
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ROCCISANO and KRISTI KIZMANN
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN , TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT , ROBERT NEMES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SEVERINO v. DIVISION OF YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 3:2011cv03767
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. SEVERINO, III
Defendant:
DIVISION OF YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES, STOLTE, VIGNUOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON et al v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 3:2011cv03561
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. JOHNSON , RICHARD T. WACKSMAN , MICHELE BOURGEAS and others
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JOHNSON et al v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 2:2011cv03561
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. JOHNSON , RICHARD T. WACKSMAN , MICHELE BOURGEAS and others
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. GNP COMMODITIES, INC. et al
as 3:1994mc00307
Plaintiff:
JOYCE M. SMITH
Defendant:
GNP COMMODITIES, INC., CHILMARK COMMODITIES CORP., ELLIOT THALER and others
DOUGHERTY v. CARR et al
as 2:2009cv06406
Plaintiff:
SUSAN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
ROGER CARR, TODD STITZER, ANDREW BONFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
