Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Fields v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv08107
Plaintiff:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Maria Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00901
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2013cv08069
Plaintiff:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Unknown Neff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Arpaio
as 2:2013cv00312
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishberg et al v. D.R. Horton Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Gary Fishberg , Robin Fishberg , Basil Allen and others
Defendant:
D.R. Horton Incorporated , Continental Homes Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Fields v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2012cv02642
Petitioner:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2012cv08012
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Fields
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. USA
as 2:2011cv02458
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Uawndre Larue Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fields v. USA
as 2:2011cv02453
Petitioner:
Uawndre Larue Fields
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fields v. Diaz et al
as 3:2011cv08200
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Fields
Respondent:
Tira Diaz and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
