Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Floyd et al v. State of Maryland
as 1:2011cv00434
Plaintiff:
Hilda Leah Floyd and Emmanuel Seth Covington
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Sligh et al
as 8:2011cv00030
Petitioner:
Juan D. Floyd
Defendant:
N. Sligh, Roxberry Correctional Institution and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill-Floyd v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02876
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill-Floyd
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Matrixx Initiatives Inc.
as 1:2010cv01968
Plaintiff:
Rodney Floyd
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Callue et al v. KBR, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv02980
Plaintiff:
Maurice Callue, Dennis Wayne Briggs, Edward Lee Buquo and others
Defendant:
KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Floyd v. Yanonis et al
as 8:2009cv02310
Plaintiff:
Leona Floyd
Defendant:
Joseph Yanonis, Jr., Joseph Yanonis, Jr., Utilx Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02839
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01915
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
