Cases 71 - 80 of 217
Bey v. ACS et al
as 1:2019cv03859
Defendant:
ACS, Abigail Floyd and Gilian Hudson
Plaintiff:
Bernard T. Anderson Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pugh et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11949
Plaintiff:
Karem Rodriguez, Kevin Robinson, Theodore Rusnack and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Elliott et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11768
Plaintiff:
James W Gass, Richard Fein, Marco Gambino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Napolitano et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al.
as 1:2018cv10820
Plaintiff:
Leokadia Duszewicz Wojtczak, Maria Rivera -Tomlinson, Nini Garay and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Floyd v. Glenn Gardens Associates et al
as 1:2018cv08519
Defendant:
Glenn Gardens Associates, Gutman, Mintz Sonnenfeldt, Grenadier Realty Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Shenzhen Kingdafeng Plastic & Hardware Product Co., Ltd. v. Project Tri-Force LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04022
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Kingdafeng Plastic & Hardware Product Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Project Tri-Force LLC, Tri-Force Sales LLC, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Target Corporation
as 1:2018cv02447
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Janet D. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Garcia Morales v. New Indian Foods, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03401
Plaintiff:
Enrique Garcia Morales
Defendant:
New Indian Foods, LLC and Floyd Cardoz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGarrell v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02273
Plaintiff:
Floyd McGarrell
Defendant:
Arias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
