Cases 71 - 80 of 203
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 6:2017fj00001
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Catherine Evangelos and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brockman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Frank Brockman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stallings v. Warden, FPC Manchester
as 6:2016cv00069
Petitioner:
Frank Stallings
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes v. Stratton et al
as 3:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barnes
Defendant:
David Stratton, Kyle Taylor, Unknown Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Stratton et al
as 3:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barnes
Defendant:
David Stratton, Kyle Taylor, Unknown Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Jones v. Clark County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Clark County, Kentucky and Frank Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00597
Plaintiff:
Frank P. Castro, M.D.
Defendant:
Baptist Healthcare System, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Baptist Healthcare System, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Frank P. Castro, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chiropractors United For Research and Education, LLC et al v. Conway et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
Chiropractors United For Research and Education, LLC , Commerce Chiropractic and Rehab, PSC , Louisville Sports and Injury Chiropractic & Rehab Center and others
Defendant:
Jack Conway , Kentucky Board of Chiropractic Examiners , Mark R. Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
