Cases 71 - 80 of 567
Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00867
Plaintiff:
Brendan Freeman
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. USA
as 2:2021cv00226
Petitioner:
Joshua Eugene Freeman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. Tarrant County et al
as 4:2021cv01167
Plaintiff:
Eric Freeman
Defendant:
Tarrant County, Tarrant County MHMR, Greenbay Unit Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Arlington SWAT et al
as 4:2021cv01045
Plaintiff:
Eric Freeman
Defendant:
Arlington SWAT and Arlington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 4:2020cv02918
Plaintiff:
Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell, Michelle Knight and others
Defendant:
Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mcintire-Freeman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust, CO.
as 4:2021cv02424
Plaintiff:
FRANCES MCINTIRE-FREEMAN
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006-NC2, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-NC-2, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sewell v. Stephens et al
as 1:2021cv00187
Defendant:
Jamie Smith, Antoine L. Freeman, John Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Sewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
