Cases 71 - 80 of 168
Kirk v. Equity Prime Mortgage LLC
as 1:2017cv05282
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Kirk
Defendant:
Equity Prime Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
DRI Legacy II, LLC v. Resto
as 1:2017cv04905
Plaintiff:
DRI Legacy II, LLC
Defendant:
Gabriel Resto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Association of American Medical Colleges v. Anyanwu
as 1:2017cv03051
Plaintiff:
Association of American Medical Colleges
Defendant:
Gabriel Anyanwu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cox v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02104
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Cox
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Gabriel Illa, FNU Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02782
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentry, Elizabeth Brady, Michelle Ayala and others
Defendant:
Does 1 - 50, Ethicon, Inc., Covidien, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Exponent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lakeside Reserve Apts, LLC et al v. Resto et al
as 1:2017cv01766
Plaintiff:
Lakeside Reserve Apts, LLC and Lakeside Reserve Apts.
Defendant:
Gabriel Resto and Desi Witcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Stanley Tyrone Brooks
Defendant:
Kevin Sprayberry, Alissa Hammock and Gabriel Illa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANDY v. FAIRBANKS et al
as 4:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BANDY
Defendant:
EDDIE FAIRBANKS, GABRIEL FAIRBANKS and WHITNEY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLSON v. FAIRBANKS et al
as 4:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
EMIEL ST PAUL NICHOLSON, JR
Defendant:
GABRIEL FAIRBANKS, WHITNEY WILSON, THOMAS CRAIG EARNEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
