Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Caudill v. Officer Hayes et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Nathan Caudill and Rodney Smith
Defendant:
IA Officer Hayes, Officer Chuck Weiland , Captain Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01989
Plaintiff:
de'Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, Bruce Lemmon, Mark Levenhagen and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00673
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ALLEN, DOUGLAS BARNES, BARTH and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price et al v. Lightfoot et al
as 3:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Frank H Price
Defendant:
Masatra Lightfoot, D Boyan, George Payne and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norington v. Payne
as 3:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Norington
Defendant:
George Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Darius K Dodson
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, George Payne, Corey McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haggerty v. Kemic et al
as 2:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Harold A Haggerty, III
Defendant:
Troy Kemic, George Payne, Michael Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacher v. Hawley et al
as 3:2010cv00448
Defendant:
Kathryn Hawley, Craig Travis, George Payne and others
Plaintiff:
R Preacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampley v. Buss et al
as 2:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lampley
Defendant:
Ed Buss, Westville Correctional Facility, Timothy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffers v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2010cv00291
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, Gary Brennen, George Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
