Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Maria Del Rosario Lozano et al. v. American Medical Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30405
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Lozano , Cheryl Hardesty , Cheryl Loughry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv30115
Plaintiff:
Johnna M. Hawkins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29374
Plaintiff:
Judith R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv29054
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Hawkins
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28929
Plaintiff:
Angela Hawkins and Willie M. Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUDIOLOGY DISTRIBUTION, LLC v. HAWKINS
as 5:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
AUDIOLOGY DISTRIBUTION, LLC
Defendant:
JILL K. HAWKINS
Counter_claimant:
JILL K. HAWKINS
Counter_defendant:
AUDIOLOGY DISTRIBUTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv26174
Plaintiff:
Karen Hawkins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Perdue
as 1:2013cv00214
Petitioner:
Donnell Hawkins
Defendant:
R. A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23250
Plaintiff:
Joan Hawkins and Kenneth Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Perdue
as 5:2013cv00105
Petitioner:
Don Nell Hawkins
Respondent:
R. A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
