Cases 71 - 80 of 365
Mr. and Mrs. Louis v. Auto Giants Temple Hills, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01531
Defendant:
Auto Giants Temple Hills, Maryland, Automotive Warranty Services, Inc. doing business as The Warranty Group doing business as Assurant, Inc. and Assurant, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mr. and Mrs. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mr. and Mrs. Louis III v. Auto Giants Temple Hills Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01529
Defendant:
Capitol One National Association, Owner Auto Giants Temple Hills Maryland and Capital One Auto Finance
Plaintiff:
Mr. and Mrs. Louis III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672
Mr. and Mrs. Louis III v. Auto Giants Temple Hills Maryland
as 8:2021cv01527
Defendant:
Owner Auto Giants Temple Hills Maryland
Plaintiff:
Mr. and Mrs. Louis III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corporal v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv01539
Defendant:
Warden Weber, Secretary Green, S.C. Llewellyn and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nelson v. Minnesota Dot et al
as 8:2021cv01348
Defendant:
Houston Engineering Inc., Sand Hill District 17, Minnesota Dot and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Acuff
as 1:2021cv01096
Respondent:
Warden Jama Acuff
Petitioner:
Daniel W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dorsey v. Hogan et al
as 1:2021cv00721
Defendant:
Greg Warner, Robin Woolford, Frank Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
