Cases 71 - 80 of 330
Brown v. Tilden et al
as 3:2022cv02372
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Cheryle Hansen, Dr. Ritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdelmotaleb v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv05641
Plaintiff:
Diaa Abdelmotaleb
Defendant:
Secretary of the DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brent v. Hansen et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen and Nicki Rambo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirko v. Hansen
as 1:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Steven L Zirko
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02637
Plaintiff:
Brett Hansen and Rhonda Hansen
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hansen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06288
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Hansen
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kililo Kijakazi and Kililo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Barghouti v. Hansen et al
as 1:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, R Ojelade, . Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Qashteeni v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2022cv06039
Plaintiff:
Ayah Qashteeni
Defendant:
Ur M Jaddou, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hansen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04364
Plaintiff:
Amy J Hansen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Villavicencio Serna v. Marick et al
as 1:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Luis Villavicencio Serna
Defendant:
. Marick, . Cox, Lt. . Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
