Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Harrington v. Harrington et al
as 6:2011cv00277
Defendant:
Donald Lynn Harrington and Thomas Michael Harrington
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hunter v. Harrington
as 6:2011cv00616
Plaintiff:
Stanley Wayne Hunter
Defendant:
Craig Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaes v. Harrington et al
as 4:2011cv03744
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Blaes
Defendant:
S Harrington, Avila, C S Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batts et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02777
Plaintiff:
Flora Batts , Hilda Copas , Gregory Stivers and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rains v. Harrington et al
as 4:2011cv03664
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Rains
Defendant:
S. Harrington, L. Vatani and Dr. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Harrington et al
as 4:2011cv03492
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
S Harrington, L Vatani, Avela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Harrington & Richardson, Model: Pardner Pump, 20 Gauge shotgun, SN: NY561157 et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harrington & Richardson, Model: Pardner Pump, 20 Gauge shotgun, SN: NY561157 and Any and All Associated Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
King v. Boyle et al
as 7:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Martin D King
Defendant:
NFN Boyle, NFN Cozby and M Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Harrington Icehouse Bar & Grill, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv02492
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Harrington Icehouse Bar & Grill, LLC, Dana S Harrington and Amanda L. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
Harrington v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 4:2011cv01787
Plaintiff:
Barbara Harrington
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
