Cases 71 - 80 of 200
Harrison v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Leroy Harrison
Defendant:
Mike Brown, Winston County Jail and Whitman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
Abbie Harrison
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Coca-Cola Bottling Company United-East, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall Harrison
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griggs v. Dunn et al
as 1:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Griggs
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv01904
Plaintiff:
Venture Harrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S Dunn , Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Blue et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Author Lee Harrison
Defendant:
Billy Blue , Donald W. Farris and Sharon McSwain Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiq, S. Howard, LPN Roders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al(MAG2)
as 2:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
Venture Harrison
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S. Dunn , Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv01352
Plaintiff:
Davon L Ellis
Defendant:
Cameron N Jones, S Harrison and Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. W. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00671
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Hranday W., Shontavious Smith, H. Witrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
