Cases 71 - 80 of 146
Hart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02535
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hart
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maclachlan et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2015cv10001
Defendant:
BMI Refractory Services, Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC, General Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Maclachlan and Pat Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01397
Plaintiff:
Margie Hart
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01391
Plaintiff:
Will Hart
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patton v. VXI Global Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
Aaron Patton
Defendant:
VXI Global Solutions, Inc., David Zhou, Staff Right Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Karon Louise Hart
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01010
Plaintiff:
Carroll Denton Hart
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Fri et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Plaintiff:
James Evans
Defendant:
Garth Fri, Preston Messer, Brittney Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Aswin Ganapathy Hospitality Associates, Inc. et al v. Melfi et al
as 4:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
Aswin Ganapathy Hospitality Associates, Inc. and Indira Periysamy
Defendant:
James J Melfi , Gerry Lambert , John Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
