Cases 71 - 80 of 180
NELLY LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
NELLY LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv07365
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
EL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2014cv06773
Plaintiff:
BILLEL JAFARI EL
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America et al v. Crouse
as 1:2014cv01850
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Erik Eberz and Internal Revenue Service
Defendant:
Kevin M. Crouse
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Beam v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2014cv01706
Plaintiff:
Troy Beam
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PLATTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. PLATTS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532
LEROY v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2014cv01042
Plaintiff:
GUY LEROY
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014mc00137
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Zandieh v. Snyder et al
as 1:2014cv00879
Plaintiff:
Ata Zandieh
Defendant:
William R. Snyder, Jr. and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Spagnolo v. SDDS et al
as 1:2014cv00855
Plaintiff:
Nick Spagnolo
Defendant:
SDDS, ADP and United States Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
