Cases 71 - 76 of 76
International Monetary Group, Inc. et al v. Zap Corporation et al
as 9:2007cv80520
Plaintiff:
International Monetary Group, Inc. and Michael C. Scher
Defendant:
Zap Corporation, Zap Corporation, Steven Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Zap v. International Monetary Group Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02689
Plaintiff:
Zap
Defendant:
International Monetary Group Inc. and Michael C. Sher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shaw v. International Monetary Fund (I.M.F.) et al
as 2:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Rose Shaw
Defendant:
International Monetary Fund (I.M.F.), Internal Revenue Service, District Director and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212 Injunctive Relief from IRS Lien
Shaw v. International Monetary Fund (I.M.F.) et al
as 2:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
Richard Shaw
Defendant:
International Monetary Fund (I.M.F), Internal Revenue Service, District Director and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212 Injunctive Relief from IRS Lien
Lewis v. International Monetary Fund et al
as 3:2007cv01008
Plaintiff:
Roy Albert Lewis
Defendant:
International Monetary Fund, Internal Revenue Service, District Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
PETERSON, et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC, et al
as 1:2001cv02094
Garnishee:
WORLD BANK, BANK OF JAPAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH D. PETERSON, ALICE GORDON, JOHN R. BLOCKER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, JAY GLENN and others
Claimant:
COOK COLLECTION ATTORNEYS, PLC and DAVID J. COOK, ESQ.
Special Master:
KAREN KRUGER, ANNIE PENNOK KAPLAN, ALAN LEE BALARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
