Cases 71 - 80 of 851
Irizarry v. Ransom et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Petitioner:
Andy Irizarry
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irizarry v. Ransom et al
as 3:2022cv01646
Petitioner:
Andy Irizarry
Respondent:
Kevin Ransom and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20731
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN IRIZARRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Platero et al v. Grand Hyatt et al
as 1:2022cv08680
Plaintiff:
Tracy Platero, Jimmy Au, Desmond Andrews and others
Defendant:
Grand Hyatt and New York Hotel and Motel Trades Council, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Irizarry v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Aida Irizarry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Larregui-Santiago v. Estados Unidos de America
as 3:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Hipolito Larregui-Santiago
Defendant:
Estados Unidos de America, Angel L. Adams, Sr. Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AYALA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17110
Plaintiff:
FERDINAND IRIZARRY AYALA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15830
Plaintiff:
EDNIEL IRIZARRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12306
Plaintiff:
ANGEL DAVID IRIZARRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
