Cases 71 - 80 of 2,932
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Respondent:
Officer Porter, Brian P. Kemp, Tyrone Oliver and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02360
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Petitioner:
Yakenski Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02280
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Defendant:
SARGEANT TUKES, OFFICER EVONNE MARIE FOYE, OFFICER RAPUNZEL TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
FYR SFR Borrower, LLC v. Hall et al
as 1:2024cv02105
Defendant:
Kesha Hall, Eugene Campbell and Jordan Jones
Plaintiff:
FYR SFR Borrower, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jones v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00035
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Kemoa Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
