Cases 71 - 80 of 1,444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
D. P. v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2023cv20573
Plaintiff:
D. P.
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN, ADULT DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT CENTER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv18576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SALAHUDDIN v. PLUMERI JR et al
as 2:2023cv15725
Plaintiff:
BILAL SALAHUDDIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. PLUMERI JR, ATHONY G PEGUES and JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIFA et al v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv14101
Plaintiff:
DOMINGO TIFA and SARA SANTANA DE TIFA, HIS SPOUSE PER QUOD
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART OF SECAUCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LYAK v.CITY OF HACKENSACK et al.
as 2:2023cv13104
Plaintiff:
REUVEN LYAK
Defendant:
CITY OF HACKENSACK, Raymond Guidetti, BENNY MARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
