Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Jackson v. Thaler
as 6:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. Dallas County
as 3:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Walton
Defendant:
Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Texas D of Criminal Justice
as 3:2009cv01982
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee White, Jr
Defendant:
Texas D of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Texas D of Criminal Justice
as 7:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee White, Jr
Defendant:
Texas D of Criminal Justice, Michael D Hill, Tamilay Metzger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz et al v. Alza Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01674
Plaintiff:
Leonor De La Cruz, Leonor De La Cruz, Jimmy Lee De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Alza Corporation and Sandoz Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Osteen v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01527
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Osteen
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sweed v. D. Grounds
as 3:2009cv00112
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Sweed
Respondent:
D. Grounds
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sweed v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Sweed
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mays v. Alford et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Mays
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
