Cases 71 - 80 of 147
Johnson v. Hollingsworth et al
as 2:2017cv02500
Defendant:
Julio Calderin, Carson City, Nevada, Frank Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Soto v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02466
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Rafael Mendez-Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winslow v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv02374
Defendant:
Dwayne Deal, James Dzurenda, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Romario Winslow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Marquez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02335
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv02305
Defendant:
Regina Barrett, Guy Brown, Carson City, Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Leavitt v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-16698
Petitioner - Appellant:
TODD MITCHELL LEAVITT
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
White v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02216
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Shawn Lewis White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fast Horse v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv02141
Defendant:
Elissa Cadish, Dwayne Deal, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Lavern C. Fast Horse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02131
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Michael Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
