Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Daniel Corring v. SMCI Supervising Officials, et al
as 13-60846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GEORGE CORRING
Defendant - Appellee:
SMCI SUPERVISING OFFICIALS, Watch Commanders, Psychiatric Doctors, WARDEN, SUPERINTENDENT and others
Hopkins v. Denmark et al
as 2:2013cv00253
Plaintiff:
Michael Hopkins
Defendant:
Johnny Denmark and Joy Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Denmark et al
as 1:2013cv00567
Plaintiff:
Michael Hopkins
Defendant:
Johnny Denmark , Joy Ross and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
Sidney L. Stallworth
Defendant:
Ronald King, Johnnie Denmark and Regina Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Billy Morris
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 13-60769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, also known as John Doe and others
Bosarge v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen Bosarge
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Ron King , Chiquita Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raines v. Box
as 1:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dwayne Raines
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ollie Evans v. Ronal Woodall, et al
as 13-60711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RONAL WOODALL, CONSTANTINE P. CHAROGLU, Medical Doctor, DOCTOR CHARMAN MCCLEAVE and others
Hubbard v. South Mississippi Correctional Institute et al
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
South Mississippi Correctional Institute, Lt. Bonner and Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
