Cases 71 - 80 of 158
Vida v. Collins
as 3:2017cv01551
Defendant:
Judge John L. Collins
Plaintiff:
George Vida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vida v. Stone
as 3:2017cv01550
Defendant:
Judge Ronald W. Stone
Plaintiff:
George Vida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McKnight v. Kolberg et al
as 2:2017cv01344
Defendant:
ADA Adam Gibb, Judge Michael Greenlick, ADA Dave Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Tim McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kofoed v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2017cv01342
Defendant:
Chief Justice Thomas A. Balmer, Judge Jonathan R. Hill, Emily Hurliman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Kofoed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vrooman v. Beaverton City et al
as 3:2017cv01051
Defendant:
Cate Arnold, Lacy Beaty, Beaverton City and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles Vrooman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Snyder v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00935
Defendant:
Stacey Borgman, Judge Douglas Van Dyke, Michael Haines and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Joshua Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medenbach v. McShane et al
as 1:2017cv00751
Defendant:
Asst U.S. Attorney Douglas W. Fong and U.S. District Judge Michael McShane
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Medenbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Beatty et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Defendant:
Judge C. Beatty and Judge Mercedes F. Diez
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Bearden et al
as 3:2016cv02033
Respondent:
Judge Bearden, Board of Parole, Jamiel Brown and others
Petitioner:
James Ramon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
