Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Plentyhawk v. Sheikh et al
as 1:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Wendell Plentyhawk
Defendant:
Mansoor Sheikh, Frederick Ferguson, Jennifer L. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kelly v. Biomet Orthopedics, Inc.
as 9:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Delia K. Kelly
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maryland Casualty Company v. Lightfoot Veterinary Services et al
as 4:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maryland Casualty Company
Defendant:
Lightfoot Veterinary Services, Randall Cromwell, Candyce Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly Supply v. Economy Polymers and Chemicals et al
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kelly Supply
Defendant:
Economy Polymers and Chemicals , Sidney Investments , Travis Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Kelly v. Valley Bank, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kelly
Defendant:
Valley Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Whipple III et al v. Mann Mortgage, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Oliver M Whipple III and Kelly Ware
Defendant:
Mann Mortgage, LLC, Government National Mortgage Assn., Unknown Sponsor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell, et al v. Earl, et al
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marion I. Howell and Francis L. Howell
Defendant:
Travis Earl , Kelli Munter , Scott Secor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2013cv00026
Petitioner:
Gyme Kelly
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Kirkegard et al
as 9:2013cv00084
Petitioner:
Gyme Kelly
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maynard v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Kelly R. Maynard
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
