Cases 71 - 80 of 503
Defoe v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00800
Plaintiff:
Anthony Edward Defoe
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadden v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00767
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hadden
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
Terry Don Wooten
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eric Goodwin
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Bettina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowrance v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00786
Plaintiff:
Roger Deon Lowrance
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00845
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lane
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00765
Plaintiff:
Clarence Edward Jones
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00851
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerome Turner
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00753
Plaintiff:
Michael Roger Mayfield
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00766
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
