Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Curry v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
Betty Curry
Defendant:
Edward Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharry v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv01258
Plaintiff:
Curtis Sharry
Defendant:
Edward Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson et al v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv01235
Plaintiff:
Ray L Peterson and Susan K Jones
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Lake Raider, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00507
Plaintiff:
Mike Stokes
Defendant:
Lake Raider, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hildebrand et al v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv00951
Plaintiff:
Frances Hildebrand and Roy Hildebrand
Defendant:
Ed Lake , Joel Nico Gomez and Mark Oblander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Connie Sue Miller
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salisbury v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv00730
Plaintiff:
Pauline Salisbury
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clanton et al v. Brogdon et al
as 5:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
Troy Clanton , Rose Rabon and South Star Services Inc
Defendant:
Chris Brogdon , Connie Brogdon , Kenmetal LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jantzen et al v. Lake et al
as 5:2013cv00670
Plaintiff:
Milo Jantzen and Bertha Jantzen
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. 358 San Fernando Avenue, Stockton California, One Parcel of Property et al
as 5:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
358 San Fernando Avenue, Stockton California, One Parcel of Property, 19963 Pine Mountain Drive, Groveland, California, One Parcel of Property, 244 Navajo Road, Lake Ozark, Missouri, One Parcel of Property and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
