Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Boyd v. Daniels et al
as 2:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Durwin C. Boyd
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels , Sergeant Watson , Lieutenant Brumley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holstick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2012cv00668
Plaintiff:
Lieutenant Skylare Holstick
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
DeMarquies Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Louis D. Boyd, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Thomas et al (INMATE1) (CONSENT)
as 2:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , Willie Thomas , Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAteer v. Plainer et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00285
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Elizabeth Plainer and Lieutenant Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague v. Bell et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Russell Montague
Defendant:
Lieutenant Bell, Officer Thelms, Officer Stacks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holstick v. Giles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2010cv01050
Plaintiff:
Lieutenant Holstick
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McAlpine v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00384
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McAlpine
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Correctional Medical Service, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Arrington
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, David Wise, Lieutenant Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Nixon et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Defendant:
Captain Nixon, Lieutenant Liles and Officer Knight
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
