Cases 71 - 80 of 90
HARRIS v. LARIVA
as 1:2014cv01004
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Respondent:
LEANNE LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WILLIAMS v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2014cv00093
Respondent:
B.O.P., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LEANNE LARIVA
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. RIVA
as 2:2014cv00039
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Respondent:
LEANNE RIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2014cv00033
Respondent:
BOP, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LEANNE LARIVA and others
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00021
Respondent:
LEANNE LARIVA
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2014cv00011
Respondent:
BOP, DEPARTMENT DEFENDANT OF JUSTICE, LEANNE LARIVA and others
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'NEAL et al v. BUMBO INTERNATIONAL
as 1:2014cv00013
Defendant:
BUMBO (PTY.) LTD. and BUMBO INTERNATIONAL TRUST
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH O'NEAL and LEANNE O'NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILLIAMS v. RIVERA
as 2:2013cv00404
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA RIVERA
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
