Cases 71 - 80 of 407
MAXWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19675
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MAXWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Austin v. C.O. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Austin, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Campbell, Sgt. Ewing, Sgt. Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Maxwell
Defendant:
Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
LUJAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18585
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL LUJAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YAVARASKI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17801
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL YAVARASKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MAXWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16967
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL and ALEXANDER G MAXWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MAXWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15204
Plaintiff:
CASEY MAXWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tatum v. Snyder et al
as 2:2022cv14282
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Tatum
Defendant:
William D Snyder and Steven O'leary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Caplan v. 1ST CHOICE MOBILE AUTO REPAIR, INC. et al
as 0:2022cv61359
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
1ST CHOICE MOBILE AUTO REPAIR, INC. and MELBOURNE A. MAXWELL and JENNIFER M. MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Maxwell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01190
Petitioner:
WAYNE MAXWELL and Wayne M. Maxwell
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
