Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Spencer v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2012cv01835
Petitioner:
Demetrius R Spencer
Respondent:
Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Miller et al
as 9:2012cv01243
Plaintiff:
Maurice I Williams
Defendant:
Brenda Ingram Miller, Anothy Whittenington, A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanding v. Warden McCormick Correctional Institution
as 8:2012cv01179
Petitioner:
Ronald Blanding
Respondent:
Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Cartledge et al
as 9:2012cv01127
Plaintiff:
William Washington
Defendant:
Leroy Cartledge, H Glickwell, L Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2012cv00950
Petitioner:
Robert Pitts
Respondent:
Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Superintendent
as 9:2012cv00627
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Freeman
Respondent:
Warden McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2011cv03328
Petitioner:
Kenneth John Butler
Respondent:
Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinney v. Director SC Dept of Corrections
as 4:2011cv01471
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Mickinney
Respondent:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. United States Forestry Service et al
as 8:2011cv01299
Plaintiff:
Vernon W Williams
Defendant:
United States Forestry Service , State of South Carolina, The and McCormick, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Finch v. McCormick Correctional Institution et al
as 4:2011cv00858
Plaintiff:
Profit J Finch
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution, Warden Rushton, Warden Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
