Cases 71 - 80 of 15,385
Kirsh v. BP Products North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Michael B Kirsh
Defendant:
BP Products North America, Inc. and Robert Grosman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MT Leasing, LLC v. Stevens et al
as 5:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
MT Leasing, LLC
Defendant:
R. Michael Stevens and Nancy B Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liscano v. Ector County, Texas
as 7:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Michael Liscano
Defendant:
Ector County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY GARNER, JERYL LUCIANI and Michael CRAIN,
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Haynes v. Shonaz Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Shonaz Foods, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. The City of El Lago
as 4:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Palmer
Defendant:
The City of El Lago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UC Partners, LLC d/b/a Unique Capital Management, LLC v. Keaton et al
as 3:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
UC Partners LLC doing business as Unique Capital Management LLC
Defendant:
James Keaton, Michael Keaton, Vladimir Abu-Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
