Cases 71 - 80 of 115
Tanzer v. Tanzer
as 2:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tina Tanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Hills et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Fredrick T Hills, Tricia Campbell, Megan Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Campbell et al
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell, Fredrick Hills, Elizabeth Tanzer Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Campbell
as 2:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Michael Schwartz, Tina Tanzer Dropps, Lisa Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Miller
as 2:2012cv02638
Defendant:
Vicki Miller
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Tanzer et al
as 2:2012cv02627
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Tina Tanzer, Tricia Campbell, Michael Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Babeu et al
as 2:2012cv02573
Petitioner:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Respondent:
Paul R Babeu, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tanzer v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv02537
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Schwartz
as 2:2012cv02478
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Michael Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
