Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Lee v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv06592
Plaintiff:
Marquis Terrell Lee
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joseph v. Grant et al
as 7:2014cv07767
Plaintiff:
Natima Joseph
Defendant:
Terrell Marquis Grant and New Prime Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. LaMora
as 9:2014cv01018
Plaintiff:
Marquis Lenox Parker
Defendant:
R. LaMora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zayas v. NISI Food Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv04332
Plaintiff:
Manuel Zayas
Defendant:
NISI Food Corp. , Hardin 73 Inc. , Anisa Food Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cook v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00382
Defendant:
Gary Cha, City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 Through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Oneida Savings Bank et al v. Uni-Ter Underwriting Management Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv00746
Plaintiff:
Oneida Savings Bank , Marquis Companies I, Inc. , Pinnacle Healthcare, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Uni-Ter Underwriting Management Corporation, Uni-Ter Claims Services Corporation, U.S. RE Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02168
Plaintiff:
Marquis Davis
Defendant:
Michele Herbst, Shane A. Maynard and Kelvin Perez
212) 788-0367 (fax:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGrain v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Brandee McGrain
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. , Marriott Hotels and Resorts and Marriott Marquis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
