Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Jong Park v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, In
as 11-55314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONG HUN PARK, AKA Don Park
Defendant - Appellee:
MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ibanez v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.
as 6:2010cv01219
Defendant:
Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. doing business as Marriott Vacation Club
Plaintiff:
Linda Ibanez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Dillon v. Marriott Intl Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Erin Dillon
Defendant:
Marriott Intl Inc , Marriott Vacation Club International , Marriott Oceanwatch Villas At Grand Dunes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
VALENTI et al v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00758
Plaintiff:
ALEX VALENTI, KYLE VALENTI, JAMES VALENTI and others
Defendant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coyle v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv01202
Plaintiff:
Susan Coyle
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
