Cases 71 - 80 of 187
City of Bowie, Maryland v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02773
Plaintiff:
City of Bowie, Maryland
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Franklin, NH, City of et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06608
Plaintiff:
Franklin, NH, City of, Laconia, NH, City of and Derry, NH, Town of
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Portland, Oregon v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01648
Plaintiff:
City of Portland, Oregon
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nye County v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Nye County
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Chula Vista et al v. Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01661
Plaintiff:
City of Chula Vista, California and The People of the State of California
Defendant:
Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Madera, et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
County of Madera, The People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Imperial et al v. Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
County of Imperial and The People of the State of California
Defendant:
Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Madera, A Political Subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022at00845
Plaintiff:
County of Madera, A Political Subdivision of the State of California and The People of the State of California, Acting By And Through The County Of Madera
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Amador et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
County of Amador
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Lakeport, California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06468
Plaintiff:
CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the CITY OF LAKEPORT, COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, a political subdivision of the State of California and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
