Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Smith v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2010cv12261
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Saginaw County Circuit Court and Michigan Attorney General
Gen Medicine P C v. Horizon CMS Hlth
as 2:1996cv72624
Plaintiff:
General Medicine, P. C.
Defendant:
Horizon/CMS Health Care Corporation
Movant:
Linda Damer , Michigan Attorney General , Thomas Prose and others
Smith et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2009cv02926
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Smith , Ewa Czerska , Sophie Paquerault and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Ascent Healthcare Solutions and others
Interested_party:
USA , Michigan Attorney General's Office , Montana, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Smith v. Berrios et al
as 5:2009cv13979
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith
Defendant:
Miquel Berrios, John Schlinker, State of Michigan, Governor of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Blaine Gray, II v. State of Michigan Attorney Gen
as 09-2004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLAINE VILLADA GRAY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Michigan Office
Gray v. State of Michigan Attorney General
as 2:2009cv12592
Plaintiff:
Blaine Villada Gray, II
Defendant:
State of Michigan Attorney General
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Civil Rights
Ream v. Bell
as 2:2009cv12188
Petitioner:
David Gordon Ream
Respondent:
Thomas K. Bell and Michigan Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley Austin v. Deanna Austin, et al
as 09-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY S. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEANNA L. AUSTIN, SAMUEL D. SWEET, TRACY M. CLARK and others
Gary Hann v. State Treasurer, et al
as 09-1579
Debtor:
In re: GARY S. HANN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY S. HANN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE TREASURER, VICTORIA A. REARDON, MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
