Cases 71 - 80 of 688
Nam Ba Nguyen v. Orange County District Attorney et al
as 8:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Nam Ba and Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
Orange County District Attorney and George Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nam Ba Nguyen v. Orange County Social Service Agency Children and Family et al
as 8:2022cv01880
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Nam Ba and Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
Orange County Social Service Agency Children and Family, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Management
as 2:2022cv06391
Plaintiff:
Kum Nam Lee
Defendant:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07578
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lee v. Proland Management
as 1:2022cv08501
Petitioner:
Kim Nam Lee
Respondent:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Proland Management
as 6:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Kum Nam Lee
Defendant:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexandre et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Luciano Alexandre, Christine Louise Johnson, Eric Nelson and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kum Lee v. Proland Management
as 22-55741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUM NAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
PROLAND MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
