Cases 71 - 80 of 645
(PC) Draughn v. Kern County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
David Brandon Draughn
Defendant:
Kern County Sheriff's Department, Jason Luker, Jonathan Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toole v. Affirm Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Toole
Defendant:
Affirm Holdings, Inc., Max Levchin and Michael Linford
Petitioner:
Birgul Arslan, Michael Bergenholtz, Daryn Bourbin and others
(PC) Stephens v. Primm et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephens
Defendant:
Primm, L. Davis, M. Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crystal Chapman v. George M. Nunez
as 8:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
George M. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PC) Lomeli v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Marcos Lomeli
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, A. Alafa, R Olivarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Sanchez v. Muro et al
as 1:2021cv01770
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Sanchez
Defendant:
Marina Muro, Perez, J. Nunez-Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Ynoa-Nunez
as 3:2021cv09730
Plaintiff:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
Franklin Ynoa-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) - Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Nunez v. Gamboa
as 3:2021cv02046
Petitioner:
Isaias Lopez Nunez
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv09340
Plaintiff:
Barbara Robinson, Bobby Cheshire, Bobby Garrison and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
