Cases 71 - 80 of 236
CASTRO v. KASTORA et al
as 5:2018cv01029
Plaintiff:
PHAROAH CASTRO
Defendant:
KASTORA, MICHELLE CORA, JESSICA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIDALGO v. OVERMYER
as 3:2018cv00049
Petitioner:
EFRAIN HIDALGO
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv01010
Petitioner:
LEVI THOMPSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANGLE v. SUPERINTENDANT OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT OVERMYER, SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEP'T, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. HAYES et al
as 1:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
EVAN HUGHES
Defendant:
HAYES, KIBBIE, OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. DOE 1, et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, GILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, SECURITY OFFICE and OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REYES-BURGADO v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv00155
Petitioner:
PEDRO REYES-BURGADO
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUBOISE et al v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
RYAN DUBOISE and CARRINGTON KEYS
Defendant:
OVERMYER, BERLIN, ROSS BUSCEMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WURST v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Petitioner:
ANDREW JEROME WURST
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
