Cases 71 - 80 of 212
LARD v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2014cv00038
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY and J. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ELLIS JEROME LARD, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY VAN-PATTEN et al v. INDIANA PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
STACEY BRADLEY VAN-PATTEN, VALERIE CARY, CONNIE CLARK and others
Defendant:
INDIANA PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PRONIN v. DUFFEY et al
as 2:2013cv00419
Defendant:
BRIAN BOLLINGER, JEROME BROOKS, DEWICK BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DMITRY PRONIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. International Paper Company
as 2:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jackson
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
Kristina Oliver and Bruce Oliver
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAMON v. GARRITY et al
as 1:2013cv01740
Defendant:
JORDAN CONLEY, ANDY CRAIG, RYAN GARRITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. OLIVER
as 2:2013cv00376
Petitioner:
ANTHONY HOWARD
Respondent:
JOHN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AL KASSAR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al
as 2:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL KASSAR
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JOHN C. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. OLIVER
as 2:2013cv00361
Respondent:
JOHN C. OLIVER
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OLIVER v. SMITH
as 1:2013cv01618
Petitioner:
DANIEL OLIVER
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
