Cases 71 - 80 of 180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Allied Building Products Corp. v. George Parsons Roofing & Siding, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04161
Plaintiff:
Allied Building Products Corp.
Defendant:
George H. George, George Parsons Roofing & Siding, Inc. and George O. Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parsons v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Tanya Parsons
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parson v. York et al
as 9:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Drahcir Parson
Defendant:
Nathan York, Anthony J. Annucci and Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as 1:2016cv00408
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Perez v. George Parsons General Contracting Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv00191
Defendant:
George H. George, George Parsons General Contracting Corp., George Parsons Roofing and Siding Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Matson v. Parson et al
as 1:2015mc00351
Plaintiff:
Bruce H Matson
Defendant:
Stephen A Parson, Anthony P Fisher, Pamela Ann Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Parsons v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv01177
Plaintiff:
Becki Parsons
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
R.W. v. Northern Rivers Family Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01167
Plaintiff:
R.W.
Defendant:
Northern Rivers Family Services, Inc. , Northeast Child and Parent Society , Parsons Child and Family Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
