Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Nall v. Hale et al
as 5:2008cv00631
Plaintiff:
Edwin Powell Nall
Defendant:
Stuart A Hale, Malerie C Turner Albertson, Elizabeth Hale Tank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
May v. Pearson et al
as 6:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Emma May
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, Charles Pearson, Charles Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crossland v. Pearson et al
as 6:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Crossland
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, Rex Eskridge and Dewade Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weatherford et al v. Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Charles Leon Weatherford, Carla Thompson and Ronnie Weatherford
Defendant:
Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners, Charles Pearson, Jason Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Jones et al
as 6:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Rozell Evans
Defendant:
Justin Jones and Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. American Cold Storage
as 4:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ray Pearson and Ray Pearson
Defendant:
American Cold Storage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pierce v. Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pierce and Kelly Pierce
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Muskogee County Sheriff's Department, Charles Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv00411
Movant:
Kongchay Pearson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Pearson et al
as 5:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cathy S Pearson, Phillip J Pearson, Credit Collections Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
