Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Cosenza v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2008cv10245
Plaintiff: Natale Cosenza
Defendant: Kathleen M. Dennehy, James Bender, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abrante v. St. Amand
as 1:2008cv10177
Petitioner: Tito Abrante
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bly v. Amand
as 1:2008cv10005
Petitioner: Jeffrey Bly
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meninno v. St. Amand
as 1:2007cv12228
Petitioner: Anthony Meninno
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turgeon v. St. Amand
as 1:2007cv12057
Petitioner: John P. Turgeon
Defendant: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daley v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv11872
Plaintiff: Shakakim Daley
Defendant: Commissioner of Corrections, Michael Reynolds, Robert Stork and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Brian v. St. Amand
as 1:2007cv11842
Petitioner: Patrick O'Brian
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irizarry v. St. Amand
as 1:2007cv11704
Petitioner: Joseph Irizarry
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBurgo v. St. Amand
as 1:2007cv11626
Petitioner: Daniel DeBurgo
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Bender et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv11457
Plaintiff: Albert Ford
Defendant: James Bender, Peter St. Amand, William Keating and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?