Cases 71 - 80 of 421
Poole v. Tucker
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Caleb Poole
Defendant:
Michael Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Williams
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Caleb Poole
Defendant:
Mike Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Pool Screening & Porches, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv20517
Plaintiff:
AJ JENKINS
Defendant:
POOL SCREENING & PORCHES LLC and MANOUCHKA JEAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Poole v. Leigh
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Caleb Z. Poole
Defendant:
Ms. Reva Leigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Poole v. Chaplanin
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Caleb Poole
Defendant:
Chaplanin and Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORIDA RIGHT TO PRAY TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al
as 4:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Florida Right to Pray Together, John Louden, Citizens in Charge and others
Defendant:
Laurel Lee and Ashley Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baez v. Bay Pools Service & Repair, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Baez
Defendant:
Bay Pools Service & Repair, LLC and Paul S. Costlow
Not Classified By Court:
Mark Hanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Poole et al
as 8:2021cv02996
Petitioner:
David Earl Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
John Poole and John Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pool et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 8:2021cv02785
Plaintiff:
Fred Pool and Raquel DeFigueiredo
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd. and Knauf New Building System (Tianjin) Co. Ltd (f/k/a Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
