Cases
Cases 71 - 77 of 77
Quad/Graphics Inc v. Tuttle Inc
as 2:2010cv00460
Plaintiff: Quad/Graphics Inc
Defendant: Tuttle Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canadian National Railway Co v. Quad/Graphics Inc
as 2:2009cv00847
Plaintiff: Canadian National Railway Co
Defendant: Quad/Graphics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Type: Other Statutes None
STEELE et al v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv04340
Plaintiff: BRIAN STEELE and JUDIKAELLE STEELE
Defendant: ARAMARK CORPORATION, ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, INC., ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Quad/Graphics Inc Group Disability Income Insurance Plan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00425
Plaintiff: Dennis Anderson
Defendant: Quad/Graphics Inc Group Disability Income Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00099
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Goss International Americas, Inc. v. Man Roland Inc. et al
as 1:2003cv00513
Counter Defendant: Goss International Americas, Inc., Heidelberg Web Systems, Inc. and Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Plaintiff: Goss International Americas, Inc. and Heidelberg Web Systems, Inc.
Unknown: Danielle Leah Pacik
Counter Claimant: Man Roland Druckmaschinen AG and Man Roland, Inc.
Defendant: Man Roland Druckmaschinen AG and Man Roland, Inc.
Intervenor: Quad/Graphics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?