Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Eaton Corporation PLC
as 1:2018cv22029
Plaintiff:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation plc, and Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Perez v. Brands Mart U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv22003
Plaintiff:
Walter Eduardo Perez
Defendant:
Brands Mart U.S.A., Inc., Ryder LLC., Sharpe Delivery Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Ryder v. Town Sports International, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv61018
Plaintiff:
Morgan Ryder
Defendant:
Town Sports International, LLC and Town Sports International Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv23951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
BUTLER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
RODGER N BUTLER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION MEDICAL, E GUY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryder v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv01064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Owen Ryder
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lasswell Foundation for Learning and Laughter, Inc. et al v. Schwartz et al
as 8:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lasswell Foundation for Learning and Laughter, Inc. , Fred Lasswell, Inc. , Red Ryder Enterprises, Inc and others
Defendant:
Timothy Schwartz , Design Tank, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ryder v. Andrews et al
as 6:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
James Ryder
Defendant:
Matthew Andrews and N. Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
