Cases 71 - 80 of 251
Shui v. Xcerra Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv11529
Plaintiff:
Xinkang Shui
Defendant:
Roger W. Blethen, Roger J. Maggs, Jorge Titinger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rogers et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2018cv11193
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Rogers, Jr. and Suzanne P. Rogers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson et al v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2018cv11130
Plaintiff:
Kellie Pearson , Roger Burrell , Brian Givens and others
Defendant:
Thomas M Hodgson and Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv40081
Defendant:
Paul E. Rogers, Linda M. Rogers and Massachusetts Department of Revenue
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
SKAT v. CSCC Capital Pension Plan et al
as 1:2018cv11012
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
CSCC Capital Pension Plan and Roger Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. The Shapiro Blue Management LLC 401K Plan et al
as 1:2018cv11008
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
The Shapiro Blue Management LLC 401K Plan and Roger Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. The Patrick Partners Conglomerate Pension Plan et al
as 1:2018cv11011
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
The Patrick Partners Conglomerate Pension Plan and Roger Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. The 78 Yorktown Pension Plan et al
as 1:2018cv10890
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
The 78 Yorktown Pension Plan and Roger Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. The Westridge Ave LLC 401K Plan et al
as 1:2018cv10897
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
The Westridge Ave LLC 401K Plan and Roger Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. The Mountain Air LLC 401K Plan et al
as 1:2018cv10894
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
The Mountain Air LLC 401K Plan and Roger Lehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
