Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Woodward v. Subia et al
as 2:2007cv00498
Plaintiff:
Johnie M. Woodward
Defendant:
Rick Subia, Rosanne Campbell, R. J. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nutt v. Campbell et al
as 2:2007cv00253
Petitioner:
Jerry Brenton Nutt
Respondent:
Rosanne Campbell and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Lee Ellis v. Roseanne Campbell
as 5:2007cv00123
Petitioner:
Clifford Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Rosanne Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Campbell et al
as 5:2007cv00299
Petitioner:
John H Morris
Respondent:
Rosanne Campbell, Panlli, Chief Justice George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anaya v. Campbell, et al
as 2:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Richard Ernest Anaya
Defendant:
Rosanne Campbell, N. Grannis, Christopher J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Knowles, et al
as 06-16912
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABE WILLIAMS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
M. L. KNOWLES, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SCOTT KERNAN, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2004cv03339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Monkres v. Kernan et al
as 4:2004cv02311
Petitioner:
Bryan Randall Monkres
Respondent:
Attorney General State of CA , Rosanne Campbell and Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. State of California, The et al
as 3:2002cv03712
Plaintiff:
Victor Wayne Cooper , Askia Ashanti, Earnest Cassell Woods, II and others
Defendant:
State of California, The , Gray Davis , California Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Leon Heinz Pogue, J. Williams, C. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
