Cases 71 - 80 of 1,864
GRIZZEL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00789
Petitioner:
NYAMBER GRIZZEL
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02199
Petitioner:
Steve Wilson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023ct03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STANBACK v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00690
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTWAIN STANBACK
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02164
Petitioner:
Marty Bryan Roberson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HALLUM v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00616
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMONT HALLUM
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02160
Petitioner:
Rashad Harmon
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02159
Petitioner:
Amarion Smith
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Dexter Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
