Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 95
CENTRAL MUTUAL v. WATTS et al
as 1:2012cv01592
Plaintiff: CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: BETH A. SHELTON, JEFFREY A. WATTS and SHARON C. WATTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
SHELTON v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2012cv00272
Respondent: INDIANA STATE FARM and SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: EDDIE SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. FELDMANN
as 3:2011cv00130
Defendant: HENRY J. FELDMANN
Plaintiff: DANNIE W. SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Shelton
as 1:2011mc00013
Miscellaneous_party: Norma Shelton
CLARK v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2010cv01745
Plaintiff: RICKIE G. CLARK
Defendant: G&W HAULING & RIGGING, INC. and RONALD J. SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01681
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00122
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McPIKE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv00179
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SAFETY OFFICER, WARDEN JETT and others
Plaintiff: SHELTON McPIKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELTON v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
as 1:2010cv00828
Defendant: BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
Plaintiff: DIANA F. SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Shelton et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00196
Plaintiff: Jabrita Shelton and Aaron Shelton
Defendant: United States of America, Anonymous Doctor A, Anonymous Doctor B and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?